tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6464582217095046042.post8312573948660364452..comments2023-10-28T12:17:29.118+01:00Comments on Gullibility: The Formula for Truth?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09463141694556030954noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6464582217095046042.post-24589595117857603092007-10-13T10:52:00.000+01:002007-10-13T10:52:00.000+01:00Interesting point. I think that 'science' is falli...Interesting point. I think that 'science' is falling into a trap if it believes that only it has access to the 'truth'. It's own development (check out Bill Bryson) shows this. Both Popper and Kuhn in their different ways show how scientific truth is provisional and even socially constructed. neverthless I'm with the scientists on being wary of Dogam and complete reliance on the meta-physicalAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09463141694556030954noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6464582217095046042.post-34253442900585643312007-10-13T08:31:00.000+01:002007-10-13T08:31:00.000+01:00Interesting Thoughts!Even with Science, though, I ...Interesting Thoughts!<BR/><BR/>Even with Science, though, I have found that "all" or "most scientists say that..." often turns out to be unreliable. Sometimes there are debates within the scientific field yet "politics" and "worldview wars" make groups with agendas want to claim science as their own.<BR/><BR/>For example, there are those that question Carbon Dating. <A HREF="http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/carbon_dating.asp" REL="nofollow">ansersingenesis.org</A>, <A HREF="http://www.essortment.com/hobbies/carbondatingac_szhq.htm" REL="nofollow">essortment.com</A>.<BR/><BR/>Many things are up for debate!<BR/><BR/>:-)<BR/><BR/>ThirstyJon<BR/><A HREF="http://www.freedomthirst.com" REL="nofollow">freedomthirst.com</A>ThirstyJonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15355338922751748161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6464582217095046042.post-37750658305348013532007-10-13T08:21:00.000+01:002007-10-13T08:21:00.000+01:00Interesting Thoughts!Even with Science, though, I ...Interesting Thoughts!<BR/><BR/>Even with Science, though, I have found that "all" or "most scientists say that..." often turns out to be unreliable. Sometimes there are debates within the scientific field yet "politics" and "worldview wars" make groups with agendas want to claim science as their own.<BR/><BR/>For example, there are those that question Carbon Dating. <A HREF="http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/carbon_dating.asp" REL="nofollow">ansersingenesis.org</A>, <A HREF="http://www.essortment.com/hobbies/carbondatingac_szhq.htm" REL="nofollow">essortment.com</A>.ThirstyJonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15355338922751748161noreply@blogger.com